Head to head
Coca Card vs Wirex One
Both cards run on the same benchmark test, so this compares deducted cost rather than advertised rates.
| Metric | Co | Wi |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rank | #1 of 27 | #4 of 27 |
| FX spread | 0% | 0% |
| Base cashback | 1% in USDC, paid on the 10th | 0.5% paid in stables |
| Custody | Non-Custodial | Self-Custodial |
| Virtual card | Free | Free |
| Physical card | $1 + international shipping | Locked behind Premium tiers |
| Spend limit | $30,000 / month | High, tier and source-of-wealth dependent |
| ATM withdrawals | Fee-free up to $250/month, network fees apply above | Free up to ~$250/month, 2% thereafter |
| Setup time | ~8 minutes | ~12 minutes |
| KYC steps | 4 | 5 |
| Score | 9.2/10 | 8.1/10 |
Coca Card
Coca takes the top spot because it pairs a genuinely non-custodial wallet with stablecoin cashback that cancels out its FX spread. A single-tier upgrade unlocks up to 8% cashback, 50% off subscriptions and 5% APY, which is the best value on offer anywhere in this ranking. It's also a useful crypto wallet entirely on its own. The crypto wallet includes WalletConnect, meaning you can integrate it into your own apps.
Wirex One
Wirex remains competitive. A 1.18% all-in spread puts it alongside Coca and Bitget as one of the cheapest cards tested for foreign-currency spending. They include crypto collateral credit, and Premium models are upgraded through Portfolio holdings
Who ranks these cards
I'm Tristyn Pawson, founder of ConsistenC.xyz. Over the last five years I've worked on marketing, development and growth across five crypto cards and neobanks, building at least three of them from scratch.
Alongside that I've run in-depth research on 20+ crypto banks to understand what actually makes someone keep a card in their wallet. These rankings reflect that: which problems are tolerable, and which ones are genuine deal breakers.
- Years in market
- 5
- Cards built on
- 5
- Neobanks researched
- 20+