Head to head

Bybit Card vs Avici

Both cards run on the same benchmark test, so this compares deducted cost rather than advertised rates.

Bybit Card compared with Avici
MetricByBybit Card logoBybit CardAvAvici logoAvici
Overall rank#10 of 13#13 of 13
Gross FX spread2.53%1.15%
Net cost on test~$1.49 after pointsN/A
Base cashback2% paid in points0
CustodyCustodialNon-Custodial
Virtual cardFree$15 once off/ $30 yearly premium
Physical card$29.99Physical Platinum is $50; Physical Signature is $75
Spend limit$10,000 daily / $50,000 monthlyUndisclosed
ATM withdrawalsFirst $100/month free, 2% flat thereafter$1 Fee + 0.65
Setup timeFast, but heavily gated for South Africans~10 minutes
KYC steps64
Score7/105/10

Bybit Card

Bybit's fee structure is heavy: a 2% regional FX fee plus 0.9% conversion pushes gross markup close to 3%. The 2% cashback brings net cost back to $1.49 (~0.76% above market), but rewards are paid in points rather than instant stablecoins. The 100%-off subscriptions are a heavy incentive.

Avici

Avici functions as a self-custodial secured Visa credit card rather than a traditional direct-spend debit card. You must lock USDC into a smart contract to access an equivalent USD credit line. While the underlying account abstraction technology is excellent for security, the steep physical card issuance fees and reported hidden spreads on top-ups make it a heavily restrictive option compared to standard crypto debit cards.

Who ranks these cards

I'm Tristyn Pawson, founder of ConsistenC.xyz. Over the last five years I've worked on marketing, development and growth across five crypto cards and neobanks, building at least three of them from scratch.

Alongside that I've run in-depth research on 20+ crypto banks to understand what actually makes someone keep a card in their wallet. These rankings reflect that: which problems are tolerable, and which ones are genuine deal breakers.

Years in market
5
Cards built on
5
Neobanks researched
20+