Head to head

Kast vs Plasma One

Both cards run on the same benchmark test, so this compares deducted cost rather than advertised rates.

Kast compared with Plasma One
MetricKaKast logoKastPlPlasma One logoPlasma One
Overall rank#7 of 11#11 of 11
Gross FX spread7.93%2%
Net cost on test$1.60, expensive on small tickets
Base cashback1.5%, locked for 14 days4
CustodyCustodialNon-custodial
Virtual card$2Free, Core tier is ~$120-$199/yr or 10,000-20,000 XPL lock; Platinum tier is 100,000 XPL lock
Physical card~$40 + deliveryUpper tiers only
Spend limitUnlimited daily purchases
ATM withdrawals$3 flat + 2% of the withdrawalNo ATM access on Lite tier
Setup time~10 minutes10 minutes
KYC steps64
Score6.3/104/10

Kast

Kast works if you spend heavily in USD or move large amounts on Solana. For daily small-ticket ZAR spending, coffee, groceries, the flat low-transaction fee makes it one of the most expensive cards you could use in South Africa.

Plasma One

Plasma One combines self-custodial stablecoin spending with integrated DeFi yield, skipping the friction of swapping tokens. However, the free tier is limited; the premium tiers only give tokens as their cashback, and FX fee's are high. The gated code-invite mode is not recommended

Who ranks these cards

I'm Tristyn Pawson, founder of ConsistenC.xyz. Over the last five years I've worked on marketing, development and growth across five crypto cards and neobanks, building at least three of them from scratch.

Alongside that I've run in-depth research on 20+ crypto banks to understand what actually makes someone keep a card in their wallet. These rankings reflect that: which problems are tolerable, and which ones are genuine deal breakers.

Years in market
5
Cards built on
5
Neobanks researched
20+