Head to head
Coca Card vs Plasma One
Both cards run on the same benchmark test, so this compares deducted cost rather than advertised rates.
| Metric | Co Coca Card | Pl Plasma One |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rank | #1 of 11 | #11 of 11 |
| Gross FX spread | 1.18% | 2% |
| Net cost on test | $1.47 after cashback | |
| Base cashback | 1% in USDC, paid on the 10th | 4 |
| Custody | Non-Custodial | Non-custodial |
| Virtual card | Free | Free, Core tier is ~$120-$199/yr or 10,000-20,000 XPL lock; Platinum tier is 100,000 XPL lock |
| Physical card | $1 + international shipping | Upper tiers only |
| Spend limit | $30,000 / month | |
| ATM withdrawals | Fee-free up to $250/month, network fees apply above | No ATM access on Lite tier |
| Setup time | ~8 minutes | 10 minutes |
| KYC steps | 4 | 4 |
| Score | 9.2/10 | 4/10 |
Coca Card
Coca lands at the top because it pairs a fully non-custodial architecture with stablecoin cashback that actually cancels out its spread. One tier upgrade makes it the strongest card in the test.
Plasma One
Plasma One combines self-custodial stablecoin spending with integrated DeFi yield, skipping the friction of swapping tokens. However, the free tier is limited; the premium tiers only give tokens as their cashback, and FX fee's are high. The gated code-invite mode is not recommended
Who ranks these cards
I'm Tristyn Pawson, founder of ConsistenC.xyz. Over the last five years I've worked on marketing, development and growth across five crypto cards and neobanks, building at least three of them from scratch.
Alongside that I've run in-depth research on 20+ crypto banks to understand what actually makes someone keep a card in their wallet. These rankings reflect that: which problems are tolerable, and which ones are genuine deal breakers.
- Years in market
- 5
- Cards built on
- 5
- Neobanks researched
- 20+