Head to head
Avici vs Bybit Card
Both cards run on the same benchmark test, so this compares deducted cost rather than advertised rates.
| Metric | Av Avici | By Bybit Card |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rank | #28 of 28 | #3 of 28 |
| FX spread | 1.15% | 0.5% |
| Base cashback | No cashback | 2% paid in points |
| Custody | Non-Custodial | Custodial |
| Virtual card | $15 once off/ $30 yearly premium | Free |
| Physical card | Physical Platinum is $50; Physical Signature is $75 | $29.99 |
| Spend limit | Undisclosed | $10,000 daily / $50,000 monthly |
| ATM withdrawals | $1 Fee + 0.65 | First $100/month free, 2% flat thereafter |
| Setup time | ~10 minutes | Fast to apply, but heavily gated for South African applicants |
| KYC steps | 4 | 6 |
| Score | 5/10 | 7.4/10 |
Avici
Avici is a self-custodial secured Visa credit card rather than a direct-spend debit card: you lock USDC into a smart contract to open an equivalent USD credit line. The account-abstraction security model is excellent, but steep issuance fees and reported top-up spreads make it restrictive next to a standard crypto debit card.
Bybit Card
Bybit's fee structure is heavy: a 2% regional FX fee plus a 0.9% conversion charge pushes the gross markup close to 3%. The 2% cashback pulls the net cost back to $1.49, about 0.76% above market, but rewards arrive as points rather than instant stablecoins. The 100% subscription rebate at higher spend is the strongest reason to hold it.
Who ranks these cards
I'm Tristyn Pawson, founder of ConsistenC.xyz. Over the last five years I've worked on marketing, development and growth across five crypto cards and neobanks, building at least three of them from scratch.
Alongside that I've run in-depth research on 20+ crypto banks to understand what actually makes someone keep a card in their wallet. These rankings reflect that: which problems are tolerable, and which ones are genuine deal breakers.
- Years in market
- 5
- Cards built on
- 5
- Neobanks researched
- 20+